FYIcenter 💬 2026-01-03...
@pine3ree, thanks for your feedback. we will update the tool accordingly.

pine3ree 💬 2026-01-01...
I believe that the dual format example "y:y:y:y:y:y:x.x.x.x" should be written as: x:x:x:x:x:x:d:d:d:d like in the ietf documentation because: x is used in programming languages as the hex numbers prefix d stands for decimal

shouldhavesleptmore 💬 2025-06-10...
Yeah, this is a good tool.

red hacker 💬 2024-10-05...
FD00:6512:DDD3::9JH2::CA6B

ali 💬 2024-09-10...
2a03:2880:f203:e5:face:b00c:0:4420]:443

alex 💬 2024-07-13...
[2a03:2880:f203:e5:face:b00c:0:4420]:443

Teddy 💬 2024-02-07...
Andre, that is absolutely a valid ipv6 address. Doesn't matter where you use the :: as long as you only use it once. So you could write it like this fd00:ffff:0000:0000:1:: or fd00:ffff::1:0:0:0 doesnt matter, means the same thing.

André 💬 2024-01-03...
The tool says fd00:ffff::1:0:0:0 is a valid address but it's not. The longest run of zeros must be shortened to :: which would be the one after the 1.

tom ge 💬 2023-10-09...
240e:f8::c9ff:fe52:32ec

Alex 💬 2023-08-11...
Check '::1' or just '::' You don't thinks that it's correct address and probably it has problem with regex.

21 More Comments ...